Skip to content

Conversation

@quinntaylormitchell
Copy link
Collaborator

@quinntaylormitchell quinntaylormitchell commented Nov 7, 2025

Description

When running task clean the first time after merging main (PR #1549 being the most recent merged PR), I received an error indicating that the uv run command from cache-clear of integration.yaml had failed. The command collects the tests in clp/integration-tests, but to collect them it has to import the libraries used in the code. Those libraries were out-of-date compared to the new code I had just merged from main, so the command failed. Though this is a difficult situation to reproduce, it conceivably may occur for anyone who has built old code/tests and then wishes to rebuild after merging the latest code/tests.

Changing this command to a simple removal of .pytest_cache fixes the issue.

Checklist

  • The PR satisfies the contribution guidelines.
  • This is a breaking change and that has been indicated in the PR title, OR this isn't a
    breaking change.
  • Necessary docs have been updated, OR no docs need to be updated.

Validation performed

Ran task clean; cleans sucessfully.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Simplified the test cache-clearing process in build configuration for improved efficiency.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The cache-clear task in the integration test configuration was simplified. It now removes the .pytest_cache directory directly instead of using a multi-line pytest command with cache-clear, collection, and quiet run flags.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Test Configuration Update
taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml
Replaced complex pytest cache-clearing and collection command with a straightforward removal of .pytest_cache directory

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

This is a straightforward simplification of a test task configuration. The change replaces a multi-line pytest invocation with a simpler directory removal operation.

Possibly related issues

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: replacing a complex pytest command with simple cache directory removal to fix an import conflict issue.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7a978c and d362262.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Bill-hbrhbr
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1100
File: integration-tests/tests/fixtures/integration_test_logs.py:54-56
Timestamp: 2025-08-17T16:10:38.722Z
Learning: For PR #1100 (feat(integration-tests): Add CLP package integration tests boilerplate), do not raise cache weakness problems related to the pytest cache implementation in the integration test logs fixtures.
Learnt from: Bill-hbrhbr
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1156
File: components/core/CMakeLists.txt:772-772
Timestamp: 2025-08-09T04:07:27.083Z
Learning: In the CLP project's CMakeLists.txt, when reviewing changes related to the ${zstd_TARGET} variable usage in test linking, the team is planning a refactoring PR to improve this mechanism. Guards for undefined target variables should be deferred to that separate PR rather than being added in focused dependency migration PRs.
Learnt from: junhaoliao
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-22T21:02:31.113Z
Learning: Repository y-scope/clp: Maintain deterministic CI/builds for Rust; add a check to verify Cargo.lock is in sync with Cargo.toml without updating dependencies (non-mutating verification in clp-rust-checks workflow).
Learnt from: junhaoliao
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1242
File: components/core/tools/scripts/lib_install/ubuntu-jammy/install-prebuilt-packages.sh:39-41
Timestamp: 2025-08-25T00:45:05.464Z
Learning: Task v3.44.1 has a regression that breaks shell command processing, particularly rsync commands with brace expansion (e.g., `file.{d.ts,js,wasm}`). This causes CI failures in clp-ffi-js project (issue #110), so CLP should avoid v3.44.1 and use v3.44.0 instead, which fixes the dynamic variable bug without the shell processing regression.
Learnt from: Bill-hbrhbr
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1122
File: components/core/src/clp/clp/CMakeLists.txt:175-195
Timestamp: 2025-07-23T09:54:45.185Z
Learning: In the CLP project, when reviewing CMakeLists.txt changes that introduce new compression library dependencies (BZip2, LibLZMA, LZ4, ZLIB), the team prefers to address conditional linking improvements in separate PRs rather than expanding the scope of focused migration PRs like the LibArchive task-based installation migration.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-17T16:10:38.722Z
Learnt from: Bill-hbrhbr
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1100
File: integration-tests/tests/fixtures/integration_test_logs.py:54-56
Timestamp: 2025-08-17T16:10:38.722Z
Learning: For PR #1100 (feat(integration-tests): Add CLP package integration tests boilerplate), do not raise cache weakness problems related to the pytest cache implementation in the integration test logs fixtures.

Applied to files:

  • taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml
📚 Learning: 2025-08-16T10:24:29.316Z
Learnt from: Bill-hbrhbr
Repo: y-scope/clp PR: 1100
File: integration-tests/pyproject.toml:11-13
Timestamp: 2025-08-16T10:24:29.316Z
Learning: In the CLP project's integration-tests directory, the integration tests package is not intended to be shipped or distributed - only the tests are leveraged for local testing purposes, so console script entry points should not be included in pyproject.toml.

Applied to files:

  • taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (18)
  • GitHub Check: package-image
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: musllinux_1_2-x86_64-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: musllinux_1_2-x86_64-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: ubuntu-jammy-lint
  • GitHub Check: manylinux_2_28-x86_64-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: manylinux_2_28-x86_64-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-dynamic-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: centos-stream-9-static-linked-bins
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, true)
  • GitHub Check: lint-check (ubuntu-24.04)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-15, true)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-15, false)
  • GitHub Check: build-macos (macos-14, false)
  • GitHub Check: rust-checks (macos-15)
  • GitHub Check: rust-checks (ubuntu-22.04)
  • GitHub Check: rust-checks (ubuntu-24.04)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
taskfiles/tests/integration.yaml (1)

15-15: Straightforward cache-clearing approach that avoids the import conflict.

The direct .pytest_cache removal simplifies the task and sidesteps the import conflict by avoiding the uv run pytest collection altogether. This aligns well with the PR objective.

One consideration: rm -rf is Unix/Linux/macOS specific. If cross-platform support (particularly Windows) is required, you may need to use Task's built-in directory removal mechanism or a shell-agnostic approach. Verify whether the project's CI/developer environment standardizes on Unix-like shells.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@Bill-hbrhbr Bill-hbrhbr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As mentioned let's add the editable flags for an actual fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants